The synaptic connections that define such circuits are typically made in a dense tangle of dendrites, axons terminals, and glial cell processes that together constitute what is called neuropil.

Knee-Jerk Response

Image from Purves

Recording the Knee-Jerk Response

The knee-jerk reflex (also known as the patellar reflex) is a classic example of a mono-synaptic reflex arc, which involves a direct connection between sensory and motor neurons, as well as inhibitory circuits to regulate movement.

Neural Circuit of the Knee-Jerk Reflex

The reflex involves the following components:

  1. Sensory Neuron (Afferent Pathway)
    • When the patellar tendon is tapped, muscle spindles in the quadriceps detect the sudden stretch.
    • This activates Ia afferent fibers, which send an electrical signal to the spinal cord.
  2. Interneuron (Inhibitory Pathway)
    • Within the spinal cord, the afferent neuron synapses onto an inhibitory interneuron.
    • This interneuron, in turn, inhibits the motor neuron controlling the antagonist muscle (flexor muscle, e.g., hamstring) to prevent opposing contraction.
  3. Motor Neuron (Efferent Pathway to Extensor Muscle)
    • The direct monosynaptic connection between the sensory neuron and the alpha motor neuron in the spinal cord leads to activation of the quadriceps muscle.
    • This results in contraction of the extensor muscle (quadriceps), producing the characteristic leg kick.
  4. Motor Neuron (Efferent Pathway to Flexor Muscle - Inhibition)
    • The inhibitory interneuron prevents contraction of the antagonist muscle (hamstring), ensuring smooth movement.

This reflex demonstrates the fundamental organization of afferent (sensory) and efferent (motor) pathways, where information flows toward the central nervous system (CNS) via afferents and away from it via efferents.

The inhibitory interneuron releases neurotransmitters like GABA or glycine, which cause hyperpolarization of the flexor motor neuron.

  • This inhibits the hamstring contraction, allowing smooth knee extension.
  • The hyperpolarization prevents unwanted co-contraction of opposing muscles.

Recording Methods for Neural Activity

Neural activity can be recorded during reflex responses, including in clinical and surgical settings.
There are two primary methods:

  1. Extracellular Recording with Microelectrodes
    • A glass microelectrode with a super-thin metal tip is used to measure the voltage difference between the inside and outside of a neuron.
    • This is mainly used to record action potentials or field potentials from neurons.
  2. Intracellular Current Injection
    • A current can be injected into the neuron to measure its passive properties (such as resistance and capacitance) and active properties (such as action potential threshold and firing patterns).

Intracellular recordings can detect the smaller, graded potential changes that trigger action potentials, and thus allow a more detailed analy- sis of communication between neurons within a circuit.

In a similar way, we measure the myotatic circuits in the heart.

These techniques have also been applied in the human brain during surgery, such as in procedures for epilepsy treatment or deep brain stimulation, where patients can report their sensations in real time while neuronal activity is recorded.

Receptive Fields

The receptive field of a neuron refers to the specific region of the body (e.g., skin, retina) that, when stimulated, alters the neuron’s firing rate.

For example:

  • In the somatosensory system, a mechanoreceptor in the skin will fire when a specific area is touched.
  • In the visual system, a retinal ganglion cell has a receptive field defined by a portion of the visual space.

Key properties of receptive fields:

  • Size and resolution: Smaller receptive fields (e.g., in fingertips) allow higher spatial resolution and finer touch discrimination.
  • Excitatory and inhibitory zones: Many neurons have center-surround organization, where stimulation of the center excites the neuron, while stimulation of the surrounding area inhibits it.

The single neuron electrophysiological recording is opposed to functional brain imaging.

Electrical Signals in Neurons

Neurons communicate through electrical signals that arise due to the movement of ions across the cell membrane. This is achieved through:

Types of potentials and signals

Potentials

  1. Receptor Potentials (input signals from sensory receptors)
  2. Synaptic Potentials (signals from other neurons)
  3. Action Potentials (output signals transmitted down the axon)
\[...\]

To compensate for this deficiency, neurons have evolved a “booster system” that allows them to conduct electrical signals over great distances despite their intrinsically poor electrical characteristics. he electrical signals produced by this booster system are called action potentials

Neural mechanisms-20250217102649866

Depolarization and Hyperpolarization

  • At rest, neurons are in a hyperpolarized state (negative membrane potential, typically around -70 mV).
    • When a negative current is passed, the cell membrane just addapts passively and becomes a little bit less negative.
  • When they receive input (e.g., touch, neurotransmitters), they become depolarized (more positive).
  • If the depolarization reaches a threshold, called threshold potential, an action potential is triggered, and we see a spike. The number of spikes is related to the intensity of the action potential.

Example of a neuron with a threshold potential and hyper polarization

Action Potential: A Rapid Electrical Signal

An action potential is a rapid, transient change in membrane voltage that propagates along the axon. It is fundamental to neural communication and muscle contraction.

Amplitude and frequency

the amplitude of the action potential is independent of the magnitude of the current used to evoke it; that is, larger currents do not elicit larger action potentials. The action potentials of a givenneuron are therefore said to be all-or-none, because they occur fully or not at all

the intensity of a stimulus is encoded in the frequency of action potentials rather than in their amplitude. This arrangement differs dramatically from receptor potentials, whose amplitudes are graded in proportion to the magnitude of the sensory stimulus, or synaptic potentials, whose amplitude varies according to the number of synapses activated and the previous amount of synaptic activity.

Phases of the Action Potential

  1. Rising Phase (Depolarization)
    • Voltage-gated Na⁺ channels open.
    • Sodium influx makes the inside of the neuron more positive.
  2. Overshoot Phase
    • Membrane potential becomes more positive than 0 mV.
    • The inside of the neuron is now briefly positively charged compared to the outside.
  3. Falling Phase (Repolarization)
    • Na⁺ channels inactivate.
    • Voltage-gated K⁺ channels open, allowing potassium efflux, restoring a negative charge inside the neuron.
  4. Undershoot Phase (Hyperpolarization)
    • K⁺ channels remain open too long, making the neuron even more negative than the resting potential.
    • The neuron is temporarily less likely to fire another action potential.

The ReLU Activation Function

The Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation function used in artificial neural networks is loosely inspired by biological action potentials.

$$ f(x)= \max⁡(0,x)f(x) = \max f(0, x) $$
  • Threshold-like behavior: Like a neuron, ReLU only activates when input exceeds zero, similar to how neurons fire only when a threshold potential is reached.
  • No negative output: Biological neurons do not fire negatively; they either remain inactive (hyperpolarized) or fire a positive action potential.
  • Computational efficiency: ReLU simplifies calculations, much like how neurons minimize energy use by firing only when necessary.

However, real neurons exhibit more complex non-linearity, including:

  • Adaptation (changes in firing patterns over time).
  • Refractory periods (temporary inactivation after firing).
  • Subthreshold activity (graded responses below threshold).

Thus, while ReLU is inspired by neuroscience, it oversimplifies real neural dynamics.

Sodium and Potassium Channels

Neurons communicate via electrical signals generated by the movement of ions across the cell membrane. These movements are mediated by two primary types of membrane proteins:

Ion Transporters vs. Ion Channels

  • Ion Transporters (Active Transporters)
    • Move ions against their concentration gradient using ATP.
    • Example: Na⁺/K⁺ ATPase (Sodium-Potassium Pump), which pumps 3 Na⁺ out and 2 K⁺ in, maintaining a concentration gradient.
    • Establish the chemical and electrical gradients necessary for neuron function.
  • Ion Channels
    • Allow ions to diffuse down their concentration gradient (passive transport).
    • Highly selective for specific ions (e.g., K⁺ channels, Na⁺ channels).
    • Can be voltage-gated (open/close based on membrane potential) or leak channels (always open).
    • The osmotic gradient drives ions, but the membrane potential balances the flow.

Chloride is used to hyperpolarize the cells.

Equilibrium Between Sodium and Potassium

Membrane permeability to different ions determines the resting membrane potential.
Key observations:

  1. The resting membrane is more permeable to K⁺ than to Na⁺.
  2. K⁺ concentration is much higher inside the cell than outside.

This means:

  • At rest, K⁺ channels dominate the membrane permeability.
  • Na⁺ has a higher concentration outside, and its influx depolarizes the membrane when voltage-gated channels open.
  • The membrane potential is dynamically regulated by changing ion permeabilities.

The Hodgkin-Huxley Model

Alan Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley pioneered the study of action potentials in neurons using electrophysiology.

Experimental Breakthroughs

  • They inserted electrodes into the axons of the giant squid (which has thick axons ~800 μm in diameter, ideal for measurements, hundreths of times larger compared to mammalian axons).
    • They are larger for better conductivity, which helped them having faster reaction times.
  • Measured how ion permeability changes over time during an action potential.
  • Demonstrated that K⁺ is the dominant ion at rest, while Na⁺ permeability increases during an action potential, and returns with dominant K at rest.

Key Findings

  1. Ion Concentration Dependence
    • They determined that the action potential depends on Na⁺ and K⁺ gradients, but not Cl⁻.
    • Increasing external K⁺ concentration disrupts the resting potential, making neurons more likely to fire spontaneously.
  2. Voltage-Dependent Ion Channels
    • Na⁺ channels open at depolarization (threshold level ~ -55 mV).
    • K⁺ channels open later and restore resting potential.
    • Both channels show voltage-dependent gating:
      • Na⁺ channels open rapidly, allowing inward Na⁺ current (depolarization).
      • K⁺ channels open slower, allowing outward K⁺ current (repolarization).
  3. Logarithmic Graph of Potassium vs. Energy Level
    • Hodgkin and Huxley plotted log K⁺ vs. voltage, showing a predictable relationship (consistent with the Nernst equation).
  4. Mathematical Modeling of Action Potentials
    • They wrote a set of differential equations describing ion channel kinetics.
    • These equations successfully predicted experimental results, marking the beginning of computational neuroscience.
    • The equations describe:
      • Membrane capacitance (how the membrane stores charge).
      • Ion conductance (how easily ions pass through).
      • Time-dependent changes in channel permeability.
  5. Sodium Permeability and Action Potentials
    • Action potentials depend on a higher concentration of Na⁺ outside the cell.
    • Hodgkin and Huxley confirmed that removing extracellular Na⁺ eliminates action potentials.
    • Cl⁻ was shown to be unimportant for action potential generation.

Nernst Equation

$$ E_{K} = \frac{RT}{zF} \ln \frac{[K^{+}]_{out}}{[K^{+}]_{in}} $$

Where $R$ is the gas constant, $T$ is the temperature, $z$ is the valence of the ion, $F$ is the Faraday constant, and $[K^{+}]_{out}$ and $[K^{+}]_{in}$ are the concentrations of $K^{+}$ outside and inside the cell, respectively. If we remove the constants and use log with base $10$ then the constant is $58$. 10 fold change in concentration is about 58 volts of difference. So at equilibrium (outflux equals influx) we have 58 voltages. Assuming valence $1$:

$$ E_{ION} = \frac{58}{z} \log \frac{[ION^{+}]_{out}}{[ION^{+}]_{in}} $$

Examples of electrostatic equilibrium

To reinforce and extend the concept of electrochemical equilibrium, con- sider some additional experiments on the influence of ionic species and ionic permeability that could be performed on the simple model system in Figure 2.4. What would happen to the electrical potential across the membrane (the potential of side 1 relative to side 2) if the potassium on side 2 were replaced with 10 mM sodium (Na+) and the K+ in compartment 1 were replaced by 1 mM Na+? No potential would be generated, because no Na+ could flow across the membrane (which was defined as being permeable only to K+). However, if under these ionic conditions (10 times more Na+ in compartment the K+-permeable membrane were to be magically replaced by a mem- brane permeable only to Na+, a potential of +58 mV would be measured at equilibrium. If 10 mM calcium (Ca2+) were present in compartment 2 and 1 mM Ca2+ in compartment 1, and a Ca2+-selective membrane separated the two sides, what would happen to the membrane potential? A potential of +29 mV would develop, because the valence of calcium is +2. Finally, what would happen to the membrane potential if 10 mM Cl– were present in com- partment 1 and 1 mM Cl– were present in compartment 2, with the two sides separated by a Cl–-permeable membrane? Because the valence of this anion is –1, the potential would again be +58 mV.

Equivalent circuit model of a membrane patch

Cable Theory-20250218150722481

If the entire surface of an axon were insulated, there would be no place for current to flow out of the axon and action potentials could not be generated.